|

Check for availability
From The Washington Post's Book World/washingtonpost.com
This extraordinary work of fiction about the German occupation of France
is embedded in a real story as gripping and complex as the invented one.
Composed in 1941-42 by an accomplished writer who had published several
well-received novels, Suite Française, her last work, was written under
the tremendous pressure of a constant danger that was to catch up with
her and kill her before she had finished.
Irčne Némirovsky was a Jewish, Russian immigrant from a wealthy
family who had fled the Bolsheviks as a teenager. She spent her adult
life in France, wrote in French but preserved the detachment and cool
distance of the outsider. She and her husband were deported to Auschwitz
in 1942, where he was gassed upon arrival and she died in the infirmary
at the age of 39. Her manuscript, in minuscule and barely readable
handwriting, was preserved by her daughters, who, ignorant of the fact
that these notebooks contained a full-fledged masterpiece, left it
unread until 60 years later. Once published, with an appendix that
illuminates the circumstances of its origin and the author's plan for
its completion, it quickly became a bestseller in France. It is hard to
imagine a reader who will not be wholly engrossed and moved by this
book.
Némirovsky's plan consisted of five parts. She completed only the
first two before she was murdered. Yet they are not fragmentary; they
read like polished novellas. The first, "Storm in June," gives us a
cross section of the population during the initial exodus from the
capital, when a battle for Paris was expected and people fled
helter-skelter south, so that the roads were clogged with refugees of
all classes. Némirovsky shows how much caste and money continued to
matter, how the nation was not united in the face of danger and a common
enemy. In her account, the well-to-do continue to be especially
egotistical and petty. And yet a deep, unsentimental sympathy pervades
this panorama. Looking up to the sky at enemy planes overhead, the
refugees who have to sleep on the street or in their cars "lacked both
courage and hope. This was how animals waited to die. It was the way
fish caught in a net watch the shadow of the fisherman moving back and
forth above them." I can't think of a more chilling and concise image to
convey the helplessness of civilians in an air raid.
Not being French herself but steeped in French culture may have made
it easier for Némirovsky to achieve her penetrating insights with
Flaubertian objectivity. She gives us startling, steely etched sketches
of both collaboration and resistance among people motivated by personal
loyalties and grievances that date from before the war.
The second part, "Dolce" (the title -- Italian for "sweet" -- derives
from Némirovsky's plan to give the work a musical structure), covers the
occupation by the Germans of a small village, from the so-called
armistice in June 1940 to the Soviet Union's entry into the war a year
later. One can forget that there was a period after the defeat of France
when World War II could be seen simply as a war between Germany and
Britain. The villagers yearn for peace, and many are indifferent as to
who wins, England or Germany, as long as their own men come home.
Némirovsky is superb in describing how fraternization comes about,
including French girls and women giving in to the attractions of the
handsome German occupants -- there are no other men around, most of the
French men having been taken prisoner. But the unnatural situation also
breeds fierce feelings of resentment and humiliation. Némirovsky
embodies this conflict in the story of a woman who falls in love with a
German officer and at the same time hides a villager wanted for the
murder of another German -- a murder motivated partly by patriotic
hatred and partly by marital jealousy.
One puzzling omission from the spectrum of conquered and cowering
French society is the Jews -- the one group that was more endangered
than any other, as Némirovsky knew only too well. Perhaps she wanted to
save the fate of the Jews for the next part, which was to be entitled
"Captivity." Even so, when one thinks of the threat the Jewish
population endured even at this early stage of persecution, one feels
the significant gap here.
Still, this is an incomparable book, in some ways sui generis. While
diaries give us a day-to-day record, their very inclusiveness can lead
to tedium; memoirs, on the other hand, written at a later date, search
for highlights and illuminate the past from the vantage point of the
present. In Némirovsky's Suite Française we have the perfect mixture: a
gifted novelist's account of a foreign occupation, written while it was
taking place, with history and imagination jointly evoking a bitter
time, correcting and enriching our memory.
Reviewed by Ruth Kluger
Copyright 2006, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.
|

Check for availability From
Booklist
*Starred Review* Freed of the struggle to meet basic needs, Americans
have been privileged to focus on their wants. With breathtaking
analysis, Lindsey, vice president of research at the Cato Institute,
offers a dizzying look back over American economics, politics, and
culture to examine the complexities of abundance. Improvements to
everyday life, from electricity to clothing, have led to preoccupations
with self-realization, equal rights, and relentless struggles between
the political Left and Right. Drawing on observations from Karl Marx,
Abraham Maslow, and Herbert Marcuse, among others, Lindsey traces the
transformation of American culture as prosperity has shaken
tried-and-true social conventions and the organizing principles that
centered on the allocation of scarce resources. Prosperity has brought
with it a sense that anything is possible. Lindsey pinpoints the current
tensions between the political Left and Right to a 1967 San Francisco
love-in and the opening of Oral Roberts University, both "eruptions of
millenarian enthusiasm." Despite the tumult, Lindsey sees common ground
as more Americans adopt a libertarian view, affirming core values while
making allowances for different lifestyles. Readers from a broad
spectrum of beliefs will appreciate the breadth and ardor of Lindsey's
analysis, if not his conclusions. Vanessa Bush
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
|